Friday, April 27, 2012

Thinking like a big fish!

This inquiry appeared on the QRP-CW Yahoo group e-mail reflector today.  It's from a relative newbie to QRP and it's also a reasonable question:

(Cue the Announcer - "The calls and names have been changed to protect the innocent.")

"When running QRP, is it necessary to ID as XXXX/QRP ? I like to keep things simple, want to do it right, though. Signing as /QRP complicates things because I would have to keep a separate logbook and open a separate LotW account so QSLs would verify. So, not IDing the /QRP is acceptable practice? Or what?"

Here's the answer that was given :

"Signing /QRP isn't really necessary -- the other guy already knows you are weak, no need to complicate things :-)"

I am going to assume that the smiley face emoticon at the end of the sentence indicates that the answerer's  tongue was planted firmly in his cheek.

But in case it wasn't, I felt I just had to jump into the fray and commented thusly:

"Eh, what?

Not necessarily "weak".

I've gotten my share of 589 and 599 signal reports.  Sometimes propagation is so that your signal is strong, even though it's low in power. I can't tell you how many times I have worked Todd N9NE (one of many, for example) in QRP Sprints and had his 5 Watt signal almost literally blow out my ear drums in NJ!

But back to the original question - I hardly ever sign W2LJ/QRP; and in fact, rarely mention power in QSO, unless asked. In my most humble opinion, one of the biggest hurdles to QRP success is the QRPer, him or herself.  As a group, I think we need to just operate - don't think of yourself as a sardine - think of yourself as just another one of the scads of tuna out there. If you start putting limits on yourself, then other folks will be more than willing to join you in the process.

As far as the world knows, I'm just another operator on the air - nothing more, nothing less. Informing the world that you're running QRP can, in certain instances, be detrimental. I have had several instances where I was engaged in a nice long, rag chew session, where the code was flowin' nice and easy. As soon as I mentioned I was running 5 Watts, I literally went from 599 to "Can't copy you, OM" - in the matter of mere seconds. Now, due to changing band conditions, I know this can happen even to a QRO station. But sometimes I wonder if it affects those out there who "KNOW" that a QRP signal just HAS to be weak"

Mind over matter, as it were - or even worse, that "Conventional Wisdom" thingy again!.

Anyway, tomorrow is QRPTTF. Have a full day planned - have to take the Jeep for service in the AM and as soon as that's over, I have to go "canning" for the Knights of Columbus.  This weekend is our annual fundraiser for Citizens with Special Needs.  If I get a chance to get on the air. though, I know I will hear QRP signals all over the RST spectrum - from ESP level to 599 +++.  It's just the way it is!

72 de Larry W2LJ
QRP - When you care to send the very least!


w9jtg said...

I've had my Yeasu ft 817nd for almost a year and have not yet made a qrp contact. I hold a tech license so my selection of bands is limited, and of course I am a little slow in copying, I try and try, no luck, I use a fairly good antenna. All the stations I hear seemed to be sending very fast and I am not good enough to read it and it makes it a hopeless cause of trying to break in.But I keep trying, thanks

Anonymous said...

Overhere in ON we're not even allowed to sign with /QRP, although many don't know (or don't want to) and still use it. If we want to ID ourselves as being a QRP-station as in a CQ, we just ID as XXXXX QRP, a space instead of a slash.

Have a nice weekend, 73

Patrick ON4CDJ

VE3WDM said...

Good morning Larry, I too never sign /QRP for me the thrill is knowing my signal has made in. The only time I guess I may be considered QRP when not mentioning it in the call is when I am on one of the many QRP frequencies.